Pontifications along a road less travelled.  Shall they fold their tents and as silently steal away?

292075

 

Let us imagine a purely hypothetical situation. Because it obviously couldn’t happen could it? I mean, not in a civilised country!

But anyway let’s assume you have a young man. In this case stress the young. Oh we not doubting the man part of it, but if he was any younger you’d probably call him a youth, but that’s verging on being an insult nowadays. Because youths are the ones who hang around on street corners and get into trouble with the police.

Still, accept the ‘man’ part of it but stress to yourself the ‘young.’

Anyway, just to make things difficult for him, let’s assume he’s been in ‘care.’ With several different local authorities; which screws up his hopes of getting much in the way of education.

Obviously I’m gilding the lily here for the sake of hypothetical example, because they say it could never happen.

“And Brutus is an honourable man.”

 

Then, just to put a tin hat on it, imagine that because of the complexity of the benefits system, he applies for the wrong benefit, doesn’t get his rent paid and ends up homeless.

So the local authority is asked to step up to the mark and do its bit to rescue one of our fellow citizens. They spring into action, and what do they provide him with?
A tent.

 

“I would not do Brutus wrong, and Cassius wrong,

Who, you all know, are honourable men:”

 

I suppose it’s a consolation to know that we’ve not got to that situation with young women yet.

And as one older chap pointed out to me, it never does any good coming to the attention of the authorities if you’re a young man. Some of his contemporaries were noticed and were given a rifle and are now buried somewhere foreign but exotic. To be fair, there are times when the state does want the services of young men, but they are thankfully few and far between.

But still, when you’ve got your tent, where on earth do you pitch it? Ideally it should be somewhere secluded where the kids won’t find it and torch it, perhaps with you inside. But close enough to the town centre to walk in to try and talk to the various agencies who between them might find you somewhere to live. Ideally a place with a door you can lock behind you, not canvas that might be burning even as you discuss your uncertain future.

 

At this point I can imagine people are gnashing their teeth and talking about wicked tories.

But actually the local authority who handed out the tent is labour controlled.

Yet, I hear you cry, it’s the wicked tories who robbed the local authority of the money to do anything.

Which is fine, but I’d ask another question. If you’re a councillor for this authority, how do you face yourself in the shaving mirror in the morning? (Or the appropriate female equivalent however you self-identify.) If there’s the money to pay attendance allowance to councillors, if there’s money to pay for ‘hospitality’ then perhaps, just perhaps, it could be used to ensure that young men get better provision than just a tent?

“Will you be patient? will you stay awhile?

I have o’ershot myself to tell you of it:

I fear I wrong the honourable men.”

One thing you notice when you get involved in this area of the charity world. Politicians have a very nuanced attitude to these charities. If they’re in government then the charities working in this area are a reproach. These bodies are proof that all is not well. Charities working with animals or foreigners are fine, but those who’re picking up the pieces after our ‘social care system’ has run amok through people’s lives are a pretty strident rebuke.

If the politicians are in opposition then the charities are handy. You can point to them as proof that your opponents policies are not working. Except that everybody knows that the need was there before and will still be there when governments change. Hence even oppositions tend to be nuanced. You don’t want to say anything that will be quoted against you when you eventually gain office.

And yes, there are honourable exceptions; very honourable exceptions. It’s a pity that they’re the exceptions.

 

And so the system grinds on, volunteers apply sticking plasters. Volunteers keep people alive, showered and even dressed in clean clothes so that when they have to go to an interview they can feel some self respect.

We’re getting it off pat, this church houses a Foodbank, that church houses a clothes bank, that church has shower facilities and can provide clean underwear.

But I’m afraid that we’re getting to the stage where we really ought to remember the words of Archbishop Desmond Tutu who said, “There comes a point where we need to stop just pulling people out of the river. We need to go upstream and find out why they’re falling in.”

 

“If you have tears, prepare to shed them now.”

 

Tagged: , , , ,

26 thoughts on “Pontifications along a road less travelled.  Shall they fold their tents and as silently steal away?

  1. Sue Vincent July 13, 2018 at 5:46 pm Reply

    Utterly appalling. I’m with the Archbishop on this one.

    • jwebster2 July 13, 2018 at 6:05 pm Reply

      yes.
      I know, I could say more, but let’s leave it at yes or I might start to rant 😦

      • Sue Vincent July 13, 2018 at 6:32 pm

        I would probably join you…

      • jwebster2 July 13, 2018 at 6:33 pm

        Perhaps if we did they’d have to stick their fingers in their ears so they didn’t hear us.
        It’d mean they’d have to get their hands out of our pockets first 😉

      • Sue Vincent July 13, 2018 at 6:34 pm

        Oh, is that where they were…? 😉

      • jwebster2 July 13, 2018 at 6:34 pm

        It’s the most savoury option 😉

      • Sue Vincent July 13, 2018 at 7:18 pm

        Heh 😉

      • jwebster2 July 13, 2018 at 7:24 pm

        😉

  2. Alicia Butcher Ehrhardt July 13, 2018 at 6:20 pm Reply

    Fish them out of the water, dry them off, give them new clothes, and send them downstream along the bank of the river to the next station. It’s their problem now. Upstream? Why, that’s someone else’s bailiwick. Don’t go meddling. It’s not in your job description.

    Getting someone ( in the case I’m thinking of it was a young woman, and the solution of the system was death) back to stable and responsible for themselves and having a future again, is very hard. I’m sure it was partly her problems, but I still think the lack of coordinated resources cost her her life. She had people, and addiction, and we lost her. We failed her – as much as it is possible to fail someone who isn’t helping herself (there is such a thing as getting too tired to fight any more, I think). All I can see by comparison is how many resources I have, how many she used up, and to be sad. She had such potential.

    • jwebster2 July 13, 2018 at 6:34 pm Reply

      Yes, nobody is joined up, just fob them off onto somebody else’s budget

  3. M T McGuire July 13, 2018 at 8:54 pm Reply

    There are ruled and tick boxes. The savvy know how to play them the ones who need to don’t and fall between.

    • jwebster2 July 13, 2018 at 9:13 pm Reply

      It tends to be the decent ones who suffer because they don’t know the rules and try to play fair 😦

      • M T McGuire July 13, 2018 at 10:00 pm

        Yeh and I hate that.

      • jwebster2 July 14, 2018 at 5:28 am

        our job has to be help ‘temper the wind to the shorn lamb’
        We have to stand there and protect people from the organs of the state that are supposed to be helping them 😦

  4. M T McGuire July 14, 2018 at 6:22 am Reply

    Yep. While the state makes it as difficult as possible for them anyway to save money.

    • jwebster2 July 14, 2018 at 6:27 am Reply

      there are times I ask myself my the State wishes to trap people in poverty
      None of the answers are such as might give you home 😦

      • M T McGuire July 14, 2018 at 7:11 am

        Like the going after benefit fraudsters. It’s .8% of the people on benefits. I am fast becoming a fully paid up socialist. Nationalise everything but have it run by businesspeople who know what they are doing, not beaurocrats. The rail system is completely broken and it was set up broken after privatisation.

      • jwebster2 July 14, 2018 at 8:35 am

        mate of mine sent me a copy of Rail
        https://www.railmagazine.com/news
        which analyses the latest troubles.
        Effectively we have a system where the bureaucrats can screw up and it all gets blamed on industry. I cannot see why they’d want to change it 😦

      • M T McGuire July 14, 2018 at 9:47 am

        It was bad enough for the poor bastards trying to run coaches.

      • jwebster2 July 14, 2018 at 10:01 am

        too many of our systems are run for those who administer them, not for those who use them 😦

      • M T McGuire July 14, 2018 at 11:46 am

        Also they try to provide a system to standardise wisdom when what they really need is empathetic, wise people.

      • jwebster2 July 14, 2018 at 11:47 am

        and at their worst they provide a system that doesn’t care because they finish work in half an hour 😦

      • M T McGuire July 14, 2018 at 5:09 pm

        All utterly lacking any shred of compassion.

      • jwebster2 July 14, 2018 at 5:45 pm

        I suspect that you’ll not find the need for compassion in the job description 😦

  5. M T McGuire July 14, 2018 at 11:47 am Reply

    In the dss I mean although it was always handy on the buses too. 🙂

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: