Head transplants!


I read an article in the paper today where a researcher was saying that he reckoned we’d probably see the first successful head transplants in ten years’ time. Actually he suspected it would be head and spinal column transplants, as they would probably make more sense.




The problem is, I’m not merely cynical, I’ve had a lifetime in livestock agriculture where you are regularly forced to pick the ‘least worst’ option. Try coping with a cow who is trying to calve in the dark and the rain, in a muddy ditch; when as well as calving she’s suddenly developed calcium deficiency. You’ll pretty soon learn how to prioritise. Add to that I’m a writer, so I’m rather expected to be able to extrapolate and imagine. So as I finished the article and went to get on with some work, it occurred to me that in the future, there’s no point in trying to keep your body in good shape. If you’re rich, you can just acquire a nicer body when you wear this one out. If you’re not rich, you almost certainly don’t want a body that the rich might covert.

But then, because of the weight of my background, I mentally crossed out, ‘the rich’ and wrote instead, ‘the powerful.’ Because money is merely a form of power. The servants of an over-mighty state can accumulate vast power. Indeed the petty servants of a sanctimonious state which doesn’t keep a sharp eye on its minions can let them accumulate enough power to make the life of an ordinary person hell. End up in the wrong local authority nursing home if you don’t believe me.

Obviously I could be wrong in this. The easy way to convince me that I am is by showing me a newspaper headline which says, “Communist Party leader dies because they couldn’t find a suitable organ donor.”

As an aside, it struck me that the problem with the rich is that, by and large, we made them rich. The seriously rich are the people who sell us stuff we want. Like Facebook or Google. Or perhaps your weakness is cool phones? Obviously our whims change and suddenly some of the rich can find their income stream drying up. The reason they remain rich is that they’re smart enough to diversify.

So whilst we cannot control the rich, the State can. Yes there is a lot of talk about how various transnational companies are massively powerful. That is true. But whilst companies can be international, their employees all have to live somewhere. The State is the one who can send polite people round to explain, gently, that we know where your children go to school. States have laws and prisons.  At the very least, upset the State and even the wealthiest of plutocrats can suddenly discover that there are very few places without extradition warrants out for them and it becomes unwise to fly, lest your plane is inadvertently forced to land in some country you’re wanted in, ‘because of engine problems.’

So the State can crush the rich, but doesn’t often do it, because senior people within the State want to join the rich. (In the UK, as of August 2019, to be in the top 1% of income tax payers in the UK (i.e. to be among the 310,000 individuals with the highest income), a taxable income of at least £160,000 is required. Know the right people and get yourself a nice job chairing the right quango, and you’re in.

And we’ve already seen that the Rich can take us for a ride, because they know us too well and give us the bright shiny things that we want.

But, and here is the rub, ‘we the people’ are the ones who can crush the State. This can happen in various ways at various levels. In a democracy, we the people can force a state to perform a handbrake turn. Brexit has showed that. The election of a Labour government in 1945 showed that.

When you have dictatorships, one party rule and totalitarianism it’s not as easy, but it still happens. If you doubt me, discuss the matter with the General Secretary of the Soviet Communist Party. He was one of the lucky ones, he lived through the experience. Ceaușescu faced a firing squad.

Indeed we might have a scissors, paper, stone situation with the Rich, the people, and the State. Obviously all three groups continue to exist, no group ever smashes the other because all the groups need the others or want to be part of them.

But anyway, back to the important idea, head transplants. Actually it might be brain and spinal cord transplants but it’s still interesting, and problematic. You see, it’s perfectly possible to spare a kidney for somebody. Or if you die in an accident, there are all sorts of bits of you that are still worth sharing around. But frankly, and between ourselves, by the time I’m ready to leave this body, it isn’t really going to be fit for anything else. You might be able to break it for spares, but it isn’t going to be a low mileage runner with only one careful owner.

Not only that but if you’re going to be the person who is having their brain, etc, transplanted into another body. You don’t want to move into something that might have five or six good years left in it. You want one with five or more decades ahead of it, before you move off into the next.

Now I can see there could be a shortage of donors. After all, how many people in their twenties die of something which leaves their body in perfect condition, just ready for the next tenant?
Still, there are times when we see a shortage of conventional organs for transplant and to quote Reuters, “LONDON (Thomson Reuters Foundation) – A senior lawyer called on Tuesday for the top United Nations human rights body to investigate evidence that China is murdering members of the Falun Gong spiritual group and harvesting their organs for transplant.


Hamid Sabi called for urgent action as he presented the findings of the China Tribunal, an independent panel set up to examine the issue, which concluded in June that China’s organ harvesting amounted to crimes against humanity.


Beijing has repeatedly denied accusations by human rights researchers and scholars that it forcibly takes organs from prisoners of conscience and said it stopped using organs from executed prisoners in 2015.”


After all, looking forward, executing prisoners by transplanting another brain into their body isn’t organ transplanting. And in some countries the law allows the death penalty for certain serious crimes.

So you never know, being young, fit, good-looking and driving at more than 10mph over the speed limit could well be the sort of heinous crime that deserves the death penalty.


There again, what do I know? Speak to the experts.

As a reviewer commented, “This is a selection of anecdotes about life as a farmer in Cumbria. The writer grew up on his farm, and generations of his family before him farmed the land. You develop a real feeling for the land you are hefted to and this comes across in these stories. We hear of the cattle, the sheep, his succession of working dogs, the weather and the neighbours, in an amusing and chatty style as the snippets of Jim Webster’s countryman’s wisdom fall gently. I love this collection.”

Tagged: , , , ,

12 thoughts on “Head transplants!

  1. Alicia Butcher Ehrhardt December 22, 2019 at 9:39 pm Reply

    I am saddened that the government isn’t doing its job: leveling the playing field and supporting the vulnerable while using tax money to provide infrastructure (health, education, basic needs) so that people can work themselves out of the circumstances of their birth with some hope. And every time we elect another person who sees the country as their own private park, the rest of the population lose.

    • jwebster2 December 23, 2019 at 7:04 am Reply

      I think governments should do these things, but when they do these things, the government still needs controlling because otherwise they will use these things to make the lives of the bureaucracy better and perhaps without intending to, the lives of the bureaucracy worse.

      • Alicia Butcher Ehrhardt December 23, 2019 at 3:52 pm

        I think that last should have been: the lives of the governed worse. Yes. Unfortunately, EVERYTHING in life needs supervising and a method to correct – anything unsupervised tends to go in one direction only, the good of the unsupervised.

      • jwebster2 December 23, 2019 at 5:03 pm

        And those doing the supervision need supervising even more firmly than anybody else.
        Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?

      • Alicia Butcher Ehrhardt December 24, 2019 at 12:13 am

        Exactly. Checks and balances and transparency and citizen supervision… Honestly, humans can be self-centered scum. And people with principles.

      • jwebster2 December 24, 2019 at 6:38 am

        It depends on what their principles are

      • Alicia Butcher Ehrhardt December 24, 2019 at 7:34 am

        It always has.

  2. rugby843 December 22, 2019 at 10:09 pm Reply

    That’s certainly a surprising food for thought. . .ewwww!

    Sent from my iPad


    • jwebster2 December 23, 2019 at 7:03 am Reply

      Not to be read over dinner

      • rugby843 December 23, 2019 at 1:05 pm


  3. John Maberry December 23, 2019 at 10:57 pm Reply

    There was an X-Files about this. I am quite dubious about this as well. Yes, only the rich and powerful–and with megalomania.

    • jwebster2 December 24, 2019 at 6:40 am Reply

      By definition I cannot see there being an enthusiastic group of body donors
      Somewhere in the back of my mind I remember reading a SF story where they had been through this sort of process and tackled it by reducing the level of crime for which the death penalty was imposed
      But I can imagine that you could also get people kidnapped in the street for their body.
      Internet dating could become a thing of the past, spending time in the company of strangers you didn’t know really well would be reserved for the old, ill or physically worn out

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: